Lorie Wimble Lorie is the "Liberal Voice" of Conservative Haven, a political blog, and has 2 astounding children. Find her on Twitter.

4K Ultra HD may fill the void that 3D never could

1 min read

4K Ink

4K Ink

Two years ago, 3D televisions and computer displays were going to be the technological advancement that changed the game. It didn’t. If flopped. It went from being a huge part of CES 2011 to a no-show at CES 2013.

The “next big thing” that did make a stout appearance at CES 2013 was 4K Ultra HD. Several companies put their latest display technology front and center at the show, boasting of four times the visual quality of 1080P HD. If the video below and article by Matt Buchanan at Buzzfeed are true, this game changer might actually change the game… for real this time.

There is a certain kind of brutal inevitability to 4K or ultra-high-definition displays: It constantly gets cheaper to manufacture displays that are more pixel-dense than the year before. (If you buy a new phone this year that isn’t an iPhone, it’ll be 720p or 1080p, mostly likely.) So it’s a fairly straightforward path for where TVs go next: one lined with more pixels. And while the leap to 4K won’t be quite as staggering as the one from standard definition to high definition, the case for it is much easier to make than 3-D, particularly once the prices of ultra HD displays fall to relatively affordable levels.

On the surface, it may seem as if 3D was the innovation while 4K is only an improvement and therefore shouldn’t be more significant, but the exact opposite may be true. We’ve seen 3D. Many of us have been seeing it for decades even though the popularity waned in the 80s and 90s. It’s a gimmick, one that many people simply don’t care enough about to spend the extra money on it. More importantly, it was adopted by the gadget makers but not by as many of the content producers to make it worthwhile. Many who did purchase 3D displays had a hard time hunting for the right content to make proper use of their heavy expenditure.

It was a dud.

Ultra-HD is different. Even though it’s only an improvement, it’s one that doesn’t require as many changes on the content producers’ side. Upgrading equipment is easier than changing the format altogether. One does not have to publish multiple formats to make Ultra-HD work. As you’ll see in this video, you can still see much of the stunning film’s beauty even without an Ultra-HD display. If you’re watching on a device that’s capable of a mere 1080P, it’s still amazing.

Here’s the video. Be sure to change the resolution on YouTube to “Original” even if you don’t have the right display. Note: you’ll need a strong internet connection to get the effect without interruption. Don’t go for “Original” if you’re on a 3G connection.

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k_okcNVZqqI[/youtube]

Avatar of Lorie Wimble
Lorie Wimble Lorie is the "Liberal Voice" of Conservative Haven, a political blog, and has 2 astounding children. Find her on Twitter.

Google and Huawei might be working on a new…

Google and Huawei might be joining forces once again. According to a tweet from Evan Blass, once of the most respected leakers in the...
Avatar of Brian Molidor Brian Molidor
1 min read

Xiaomi might unveil its first smartwatch later this week

If Apple did it, you can bet your ass that Xiaomi is going to do it too. In all fairness, the majority of Apple’s...
Avatar of Rocco Penn Rocco Penn
1 min read

Documents regarding the next PlayStation 4 have been leaked

In order to make up for how lackluster this generation of consoles has been, Microsoft and Sony are planning to release upgraded versions of...
Avatar of Louie Baur Louie Baur
59 sec read

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *