Sal McCloskey Sal McCloskey is a tech blogger in Los Angeles who (sadly) falls into the stereotype associated with nerds. Yes, he's a Star Trek fan and writes about it on Uberly. His glasses are thick and his allergies are thicker. Despite all that, he's (somehow) married to a beautiful woman and has 4 kids. Find him on Twitter or Facebook,

Believe it or not, the Director of the NSA is actually pro-encryption

1 min read

The Director of the National Security Agency is the last person I’d expect to come out in support of encryption, but that’s exactly what Mike Rogers did on Thursday when he said that “encryption is foundational to the future.” Unlike a number of politicians, such as FBI Director James Comey, Rogers claims that he doesn’t believe “security is the imperative and that ought to drive everything.” Both he and the White House have given up on the idea of outlawing unbreakable end-to-end encryption for the time being, though some state governments haven’t, but that doesn’t mean that they support unbreakable encryption either, something Apple CEO Tim Cook isn’t happy about. America is still trying to figure out how to balance privacy and security in regards to encryption, and as Comey himself said: “We’ve got some challenging times ahead of us, folks.”

National Security Agency Director Adm. Mike Rogers said Thursday that “encryption is foundational to the future,” and arguing about it is a waste of time. Speaking to the Atlantic Council, a Washington, D.C., think tank, Rogers stressed that the cybersecurity battles the U.S. is destined to fight call for more widespread use of encryption, not less. “What you saw at OPM, you’re going to see a whole lot more of,” he said, referring to the massive hack of the Office of Personnel Management involving the personal data about 20 million people who have gotten background checks. “So spending time arguing about ‘hey, encryption is bad and we ought to do away with it’ … that’s a waste of time to me,” he said, shaking his head. “So what we’ve got to ask ourselves is, with that foundation, what’s the best way for us to deal with it? And how do we meet those very legitimate concerns from multiple perspectives?” Other government officials — most notably FBI Director James Comey — have been crusading for a way that law enforcement can get access to encrypted data. But technologists pretty much universally agree that creating some sort of special third-party access would weaken encryption to the point that it would threaten every internet transaction we make, from online banking to filling out our health records to emailing our friends and significant others. A hole in encryption for special FBI access would be a hole that criminals could sneak through, too.

Source
Avatar of Sal McCloskey
Sal McCloskey Sal McCloskey is a tech blogger in Los Angeles who (sadly) falls into the stereotype associated with nerds. Yes, he's a Star Trek fan and writes about it on Uberly. His glasses are thick and his allergies are thicker. Despite all that, he's (somehow) married to a beautiful woman and has 4 kids. Find him on Twitter or Facebook,

China is forcing Apple to monitor and report App…

By giving people a place to freely express themselves, and allowing them to find and communicate with similarly-minded people, the Internet serves as the...
Avatar of Alfie Joshua Alfie Joshua
55 sec read

The government’s legal war with the tech industry is…

The legal war between the government and the tech industry has quieted down in the weeks since the highly-publicized battle between Apple and the...
Avatar of Alfie Joshua Alfie Joshua
40 sec read

A coalition of tech giants have written an open…

Ever since Apple refused to assist the FBI in cracking the San Bernadino terrorist’s iPhone, there’s been a massive debate about encryption in the United States...
Avatar of Chastity Mansfield Chastity Mansfield
1 min read

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *